State v. Smith
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
Defendant was represented at the probation and revocation hearing by the office of the Public Defender for the Twelfth Judicial District. Counsel for defendant has not brought forth any assignments of error. The brief for the defendant contains the following statement:
After reviewing the record on appeal and the applicable law, attorney for the appellant has been unable to determine that during the course of the probation revocation hearing prejudicial error was committed which would entitle the appellant to reversal or to a new hearing. However, attorney for the appellant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. FoustCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. HuntleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. NealCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Collins v. B & G PIE CO., INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.