Legal Opinion

Quinlan v. Gudes

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 1966No. Docket 776PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLesinski, C. J.

The plaintiffs, Villana P. Quinlan and her husband James F. Quinlan, commenced this action in the circuit court for the county of Wayne on December 15, 1964, to recover for injuries suffered “because of excessive exposures to X rays” given by the defendant medical doctor to Villana P. Quinlan for the treatment of facial skin eruptions. The defendant filed a motion for summary judgment and for accelerated judgment invoking the statute of limitations, CLS 1961, § 600.5805 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 27A.5805), as an affirmative defense. On the basis of the affirmative defense, the trial court granted…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. CaldwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bonney v. the Upjohn CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Winfrey v. FarhatMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Wallisch v. FosnaughMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Weiss v. BigmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Denison v. GoforthWashington Supreme Court · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API