State v. Watson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
COPELAND, Justice.
Defendant has brought forward thirteen (13) of thirty-four (34) assignments of error in his brief, the others having been abandoned. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court. Investment Properties v. Allen, 281 N.C. 174, 188 S.E. 2d 441 (1972); Knutton v. Cofield, 273 N.C. 355, 160 S.E. 2d 29 (1968); Pendergrass v. Massengill, 269 N.C. 364, 152 S.E. 2d 657 (1967).
Defendant contends in his first series of assignments (Nos. 25, 30 and 33) that the trial court erred in charging the jury as to the type of provocation that could mitigate the killing to voluntary…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Knutton v. CofieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. ShaneOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. NorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. PotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Commonwealth v. BermudezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.