Legal Opinion

City of St. Louis v. Kisling

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 10, 1958No. 46480PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOHLING, Commissioner.

This appeal arises .out of a proceeding by the City of St. Louis to condemn certain land in Bridgeton, St. Louis County, to be used as a part of the municipal airport known as Lambert-St. Louis Municipal Airport. Olive M. Gutweiler, condemnee and appellant here, was the owner of Parcel 39 involved in said proceeding. She contends the court erred in admitting and excluding testimony and in excluding her offer of proof of consequential damages to that part of the tract owned by her and not taken by condemner.

The appeal is from a judgment for $105,000. Condemnee’s evidence…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Gardine v. CotteySupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  2. Union Electric Light & Power Co. v. Snyder Estate Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  3. City of St. Louis v. Paramount Shoe Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Cole v. Uhlmann Grain Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  5. State v. CochranSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. MaxieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  2. City of St. Louis v. VasquezSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  3. Busch & Latta Painting Corp. v. State Highway CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. GaleenerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  5. Hotchner v. LiebowitsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API