Hotchner v. Liebowits
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BRADY, Commissioner.
The respondents, husband and wife, brought this action against the appellant on the grounds that the residence which they purchased from appellant was not constructed in a clean, workmanlike manner as provided in the specifications, in that: (A) the footings were placed on ground having insufficient bearing resistance resulting in settling and cracking in the foundation, brickwork, and inside plaster; (B) the plastered walls, stone trim and bricks of the outer walls had cracked, shifted and become loosened and broken; (C) tiles on the kitchen floor had pulled apart; (D)…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Scanlon v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- Bragg v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- Capra v. Phillips Investment CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Haysler v. OwenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
- Denney v. Spot Martin, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Iota Management Corp. v. Boulevard Investment Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Business Men's Assurance Co. of America v. GrahamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Forsythe v. StarnesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Busch & Latta Painting Corp. v. State Highway CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Bloomfield Tractor Sales, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1964
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.