Legal Opinion

Howard v. Roberson

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 20, 2007No. 4326PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, J.:

This civil action involves Jodi Howard’s claim for damages for injuries sustained in an automobile accident against defendants Calvin Roberson and Troy Lawhorn. The trial court directed a verdict in Howard’s favor on liability. A jury found Roberson liable and awarded Howard damages for medical expenses and lost wages only. Howard moved for new trial nisi additur and the trial court granted a new trial on the issue of damages alone against Roberson based on the thirteenth juror doctrine. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On the night of…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Law v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  2. Pye v. Estate of Fox Ex Rel. Estate of FoxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Sabb v. South Carolina State UniversitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  4. Erickson v. Jones Street Publishers, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  5. Swinton Creek Nursery v. Edisto Farm CreditSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Youmans v. South Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  2. State v. EldersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  3. Rivera v. NewtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  4. Hassell v. City of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2020
  5. Marshall Griffin v. Tony FiovinoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API