Legal Opinion
Timmons v. Security Savings Bank
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided October 12, 1936No. 109PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Per curiam
The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Gibbes v. Zimmerman, 290 U. S. 326, 332; Doty v. Love, 295 U. S. 64.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gibbes v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Doty v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
3Cited by28 opinions
- Big O Tire Dealers, Inc., a Colorado Corporation v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Stanolind Crude Oil Purchasing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- National American Insurance v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Hull v. Sun Refining and Marketing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Phillips Petroleum Company v. Heber A. Peterson and Astrid N. D. Peterson, Phillips Petroleum Company v. John H. Haslem and Rebecca H. HaslemCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.