Legal Opinion

Hull v. Sun Refining and Marketing Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 3, 1990No. 71179PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUGER, Justice.

The issues presented are: 1) whether a lessor’s demonstration of marketable title is sufficient to maintain an action under 52 O.S.Supp.1985 § 540,1 providing for the payment of proceeds from oil and gas production; 2) whether lessors are bound by a contract provision implied from custom and usage requiring execution of a division order in a contract negotiated by a lessee as agent for the sale of oil; and 3) whether either party may be characterized as a prevailing party entitled to court costs and reasonable attorney’s fees. We find that: 1) because the only condition for…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Burk v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  2. Oliver's Sports Center, Inc. v. National Standard Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Hall v. PaineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Gavenda v. Strata Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Sneed v. SneedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Howell Petroleum Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. Samson Resources Company, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  2. Quinlan v. Koch Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  3. Oxley v. General Atlantic Resources, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  4. Stump v. CheekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  5. Heiman v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API