State v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
In the outset it should be observed that the judgment of Judge Sinclair, sustaining the demurrers to the original complaint on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, was not before Judge Cranmer for review. He could not question its correctness, but was bound by its terms. No appeal lies from one Superior Court judge to another. S. v. Lea, 203 N. C., 316, 366 S. E., 292; Revis v. Ramsey, 202 N. C., 815, 164 S. E., 358. Nor is the judgment sustaining the demurrers before us for review. There was no appeal from said judgment. Willoughby v. Stevens,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Dockery v. Fairbanks-Morse Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Marsh v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Revis v. . RamseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Swain v. . GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Calloway v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Estrada v. JaquesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Lilly Co. v. . SaundersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Neighbors v. NeighborsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Jones v. MathisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.