Legal Opinion

United States v. Moultak

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided July 27, 1987No. 54,325; NMCM 84 3695PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant stands convicted of wrongfully fraternizing with an enlisted woman, obstructing justice, and violating a lawful general regulation, in violation of Articles 133, 134, and 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 933, 934, and 892, respectively. The affirmed sentence extends to dismissal, restriction to limits for 60 days and partial forfeitures for 120 months. We granted appellant’s petition for review to determine whether his conduct was prohibited by the regulation.* Finding that it is, we affirm.

Appellant, a commissioned officer, became enamored of an enlisted woman…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. JohannsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  3. United States v. ScottUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  4. United States v. MeansUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  5. United States v. CarlsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. ManuelCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  2. United States v. ShavrnochCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  3. United States v. McCormickU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992
  4. United States v. BrownUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  5. United States v. ClarkeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API