Legal Opinion
Byrd v. Gary
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided May 18, 1960No. Civ. A. No. 7199Published
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs brought this action for an alleged violation of the rights of the plaintiffs, Frank Byrd, Arthur W. Stanley, Jr., and Bobby Blackman, to attend Mayo High School in the City of Darling-ton and for other relief, all of which is summarized in the prayer of the complaint as follows:
1. “That the Court do declare that section 230(3), title 21 of The South Carolina 1952 Code of laws is unconstitutional, as being in conflict with the due process clause of section 1, of article XIV, of the constitution of the United States of America; and the Court do enjoin the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stefanelli v. MinardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Adolph G. Hoffman v. C. H. Halden, Dr. Donald E. Wair, Dr. G. F. Keller and Dr. F. Sydney HansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Taylor v. Continental Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Chapman v. Trustees of Delaware State CollegeDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1951