Manbeck v. Jones
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 328, Jan. T., 1899, by-defendant, from' decree of C. P. Schuylkill Co., May T., 1898, No. 2, on bill in equity. Bill in equity for an injunction.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 328, Jan. T., 1899, by-defendant, from' decree of C. P. Schuylkill Co., May T., 1898, No. 2, on bill in equity. Bill in equity for an injunction. The facts appear by the opinion of Bechtel, J., which was as follows: The complainant says he is the owner of a certain tract of land, spoken of in this case as the twenty-acre tract, which has attached to it an easement or right of way or public road leading from the same to the Berwick and Pottsville state road; and that the respondent has unlawfully and illegally removed the fences along the said road and absolutely and entirely…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
We find nothing in this record that would justify us in sustaining either of tbe specifications of error. The case was well tried, and the questions involved were correctly decided. For reasons given by tbe learned trial judge in his opinion, we are satisfied he was right in concluding that the plaintiff was entitled to equitable relief, and in adequately providing therefor by the terms of the decree from which tins appeal was taken. There appears to be nothing in any of the questions involved that requires extended discussion.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s…
2Cited by34 opinions
- Ciski v. WentworthOhio Supreme Court · 1930
- Hunter v. McKlveenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Tosh v. WittsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Heffley v. LohrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Liquid Carbonic Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.