Legal Opinion

Peninsular Construction Co. v. Murray

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1962No. Docket 27, Calendar 49,352PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

Plaintiff instituted suit in assumpsit seeking $2,405.47 (plus interest) from defendant for work done in repairing defendant’s residential sidewalks and garage.

Defendant filed answer, stating “that at the time said work was performed there was never a contract existing between plaintiff and defendant, that plaintiff corporation through its officers knew that plaintiff corporation never intended to charge defendant, for said work and knew that defendant never intended or agreed to pay for said work”; that said; work was not performed in a proper or satisfactory; manner, and that defendant did…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McNair v. State Highway DepartmentMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Berry Door Corp. v. Tom McDonnell, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Klooster v. City of CharlevoixMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Gilbert v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Thompson v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Robertson v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Dutka v. Sinai HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API