Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Department of Corrections

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 20, 1985No. Docket 71504PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShepherd, P.J.

Plaintiff appeals as of right from *31a grant of summary judgment, GCR 1963, 117.2(3). We affirm.

Plaintiff is an inmate at the Kinross Correctional Facility in Chippewa County. In his "complaint for mandamus”, he alleged that defendant’s scheme for risk classification of inmates is implemented through a directive (Policy Directive 30.06) which defendant had not promulgated as a "rule” under the Michigan Administrative Procedures Act, MCL 24.201 et seq.; MSA 3.560(101) et seq.1 The directive provides that each inmate be interviewed by defendant’s personnel and assigned a security status.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mitcham v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. Commissioner of InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Durbin v. K-K-M Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Schinzel v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Martin v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Boyd v. Civil Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Clonlara, Inc v. State Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Southfield Police Officers Ass'n v. SouthfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Edmond v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Jordan v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API