State v. Tate
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
The issue presented by this appeal is whether appellant knoAvingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived his right to trial by jury.
The accused’s right to be tried by a jury is secured in this state by Section 10, Article I of the Ohio Constitution2 *52and R. 0. 2945.17.3 Since the potential, as well as the actual, penalty imposed for this misdemeanor violation was imprisonment, appellant Tate possessed this right. However, “ [t]he guarantee of a jury trial in criminal cases contained in the state and federal Constitutions is not an absolute and unrestricted right in Ohio with respect to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City of Mentor v. GiordanoOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. HarrisOhio Supreme Court · 1976
3Cited by82 opinions
- State v. FishOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. PlessOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Haliym v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- State v. SwigerOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- State ex rel. Jackson v. DallmanOhio Supreme Court · 1994
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.