Harry Goldberg Co. v. Emerman
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
Defendant below, the plaintiff in error here, claims that the trial court, in overruling its oral demand for a jury at the opening of the trial, violated the provision of the Constitution which guarantees that the right of a trial by a jury shall be inviolate (Article 1, Section 5).
Section 1579-24, General Code, applying to the Municipal Court of Cleveland, reads: “All causes in the municipal court, both civil and criminal, shall be tried by the court unless a jury trial be demanded by a party entitled to the same. The time for making a demand for a jury trial in civil cases may be fixed and…
2Cited by7 opinions
- City of Mentor v. GiordanoOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Cassidy v. GlossipOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Cleveland Ry. Co. v. HallidayOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- Markota v. East Ohio Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. BergSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.