Davis & Shangle v. Boyer
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Mahaska District Court.-HoN. JOHN T* * Scott, Judge. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtWeaveb, J.
By their original petition Davis & Sban-gle allege that they are a partnership doing a law and loan business in the city of Oskaloosa; that they are the lessees, under an oral contract for a term of months, of a certain coalhouse appurtenant to their place of business, wicli the right to use the wall of said coalhouse as a billboard or space for displaying business signs and advertising matter; and that they have sublet the use of the billboard to one F. W. Davis, but defendants have wrongfully interfered with such use by the subtenant, and have torn down the advertising so displayed by him,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Geer v. Common Council of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Hopwood v. McCauslandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Faucher v. GrassSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- Frick v. KabakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Geiser Manufacturing Co. v. KrogmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Livingston v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
- State v. KriechbaumSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Holbert v. KellerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Babbitt v. CorriganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Polk v. Fremont CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.