Geiser Manufacturing Co. v. Krogman
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Osceola District Court. — Iíon. F. K,. Gaynor, Judge. Action oil three promissory notes made and executed to plaintiff by defendants Krogman. Defendants admit the making of the notes, but plead an offset and counterclaim growing out of the sale of certain property under a mortgage given to secure the notes. There was a trial to a jury, resulting in'a verdict and judgment for defendants and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.
*5051 *504On motion of appellees the evidence has been stricken from the record and we may only consider such of the assignments of error as arise upon the pleadings, the instructions, the verdict, and the judgment. It appears from the pleadings that on the fifth day of'January the defendants made and executed to plaintiff their three promissory notes in writing for the sum o.f four-hundred and ninety-one dollars and sixty-six cents each, due, one) December 1, 1897, *505one December 1, 1898, and one December 1, 1899, each bearing seven per cent, interest. To secure these notes the defendant also executed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Embury v. . ConnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- Kneettle v. . NewcombNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Lee v. TillotsonNew York Supreme Court · 1840
- Griswold v. Illinois Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Richmond v. Dubuque & Sioux City R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1868
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Berry and Berry v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
- Blessing v. WeldingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
- Frick v. KabakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Sullivan ex rel. Orton v. KenneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Watkins v. Iowa Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.