Legal Opinion

Faucher v. Grass

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 23, 1883PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from, lucas District Court. Action in chancery to^enjoin defendants from carrying on the blacksmith business in a shop built and maintained near plaintiff’s dwelling. After a trial upon the merits, a decree was entered as prayed for in plaintiff’s petition.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

i. appeal to courtfappeiwith Sir m-prosecute.1 I. The plaintiff, as a ground for dismissing the appeal in this case, shows that Gilbert, Hedge & Co. have acquired the absolute ownership of the blacksmith, shop, by purchase at sheriff’s sale, and that they do not claim the right to use it for the purpose of prosecuting therein the business of blacksmithing, and have no desire that the appeal shall be prosecuted for their benefit. The decree rendered by the court below restrains defendants from prosecuting the business of blacksmithing in the shop purchased by Gilbert, Hedge & Co., and upon the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shiras v. OlingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Rutherford v. KatzenbergerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  2. State ex inf. Hadley v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  3. Littleton v. FritzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  4. State ex rel. Bayha v. PhilipsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  5. Livingston v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API