Legal Opinion

State v. Barrett

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 6, 2013No. COA12-1530PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, Judge.

Where the victim’s pre-trial statements were admitted to corroborate her trial testimony and generally tracked her trial testimony, we find no error. Where the fact that law enforcement had a record of defendant’s date of birth as a result of prior unrelated arrests was admitted into evidence, we find no prejudicial error. Where there is no indication the trial court committed a clerical error in its written judgment precluding defendant from residing with his minor children, we overrule defendant’s argument. However, we remand for correction of a clerical error on the special…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  2. State v. RameySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. WeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. GellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. LindsayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API