State v. Barrett
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRYANT, Judge.
Where the victim’s pre-trial statements were admitted to corroborate her trial testimony and generally tracked her trial testimony, we find no error. Where the fact that law enforcement had a record of defendant’s date of birth as a result of prior unrelated arrests was admitted into evidence, we find no prejudicial error. Where there is no indication the trial court committed a clerical error in its written judgment precluding defendant from residing with his minor children, we overrule defendant’s argument. However, we remand for correction of a clerical error on the special…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
- State v. RameySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. WeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. GellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. LindsayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024