Legal Opinion

State v. Weaver

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 1986No. 110A86PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BILLINGS, Chief Justice.

The State called Carl Rutledge as a witness. Prior to Mr. Rutledge’s testimony before the jury, the Court conducted a voir dire hearing to determine the admissibility of certain evidence which the State indicated that it would offer and to which the defendant objected.

The voir dire testimony of Mr. Rutledge established that he was stopped by a Gaston County police detective on 29 October 1984 while transporting a quantity of tools that he had purchased from the defendant. The detective informed him that some of the tools were stolen property and threatened to charge…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. State v. CoffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. State v. StagerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. BagleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  5. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API