State Ex Rel. Schroedel v. Pagels
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHughes, J.
Three questions are raised upon this appeal:
1. Did the trial court err in overruling appellant’s demurrer ore terms?
2. Did the trial court err in adjudging that relator’s plans are in compliance with sec. 9.12 (5) of the village code?
3. Did the trial court err in adjudging that the relator had a vested right as against the rezoning ordinance ?
Upon the hearing of the return to the writ the appellant entered a demurrer ore tenus.
The petition of the relator as originally drawn failed to set out that the ordinance of the village of Whitefish Bay imposed a duty upon the building inspector to issue…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Zahn v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- State ex rel. Klefisch v. Wisconsin Telephone Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Rosenberg v. Village of Whitefish BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State ex rel. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. WahnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Kmiec v. Town of Spider LakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Lake Bluff Housing Partners v. City of South MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Alexander v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Caruthers v. Board of Adjustment of City of Bunker Hill VillageCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.