Legal Opinion

Rosenberg v. Village of Whitefish Bay

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1929PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

1. The case is controlled by the Building Height Cases, 181 Wis. 519, 195 N. W. 544. Ordinance 219, like the statute considered in the Building Height Cases, looks to the future and is not retroactive in effect. It contains the identical language of the statute considered in those cases, that is that “no building shall be erected,” etc. The ordinance expressly provides that any building on premises devoted to a nonconforming use at the time the ordinance *217is passed may be continued in such use after the passage of the ordinance. Like the statute considered in the Building Height Cases, “it is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tilly v. Mitchell & Lewis Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. State ex rel. Rose v. Superior Court of Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  3. State ex rel. Klefisch v. Wisconsin Telephone Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Jones v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Trans-Oceanic Oil Corp. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Heller v. ShapiroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Fifteen Fifty North State Building Corp. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Eggebeen v. SonnenburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API