Legal Opinion

Nika v. Danz

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 28, 1990No. 4-89-0547PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McCULLOUGH

Plaintiff, Paul Nika, filed a legal malpractice action against defendant, attorney Warren Danz, alleging Danz was negligent when he failed to file a personal injury action against U.S. Printing Ink (U.S. Ink), the party allegedly responsible for plaintiffs back injuries. Plaintiff appeals from the jury verdict for Danz and raises the following issues for our consideration: (1) whether the trial court violated Supreme Court Rule 239 by giving non-Illinois Pattern Jury Instructions (IPI) instructions where IPI instructions were tendered and applied to the case (107 Ill. 2d R. 239); (2) whether…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Alvis v. RibarIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Schaffner v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Ogg v. City of SpringfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  4. Sexton v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Both v. NelsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1964

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Osborne v. KeeneyKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Gorski v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Loretta Klump v. J. David Duffus, Jr., Law Offices of Dixon, Duffus & Doub, a Partnership, and Accident and Injury Referral ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  4. Adams v. Sussman & Hertzberg, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  5. Haberer v. RiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API