Legal Opinion

Both v. Nelson

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1964No. 38452PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Klingbiel

After a jury trial in the circuit court of Cook County the purported will of Sophia Both, deceased, was set aside on grounds of undue influence and mental incapacity. The decree was affirmed by the Appellate Court, (Both v. Nelson, 46 Ill. App. 2d 69), and we have granted the defendant’s petition for leave to appeal. He contends, inter alia, that prejudicial error was committed in refusing to admit certain evidence and in denying certain tendered instructions. We agree.

The testatrix, a married woman 78 years of age, executed the instrument in question on October 16, 1957. By its terms she…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lindroth v. Walgreen Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. WarnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Baker v. BakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Edwards v. Hill-Thomas Lime & Cement Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Grosh v. AcomIllinois Supreme Court · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Simmons v. GarcesIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Lawson v. G. D. Searle & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. J. L. Simmons Co. Ex Rel. Hartford Insurance Group v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Greene v. RogersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. Nika v. DanzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API