Will v. Department of Health & Social Services
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
To secure the writ of mandamus sought, appellant was required to establish “. . . a clear legal right” to the performance of a “. . . duty-sought to be enforced [which] is positive and plain . ...” 2 The motion to quash an alternative writ of mandamus is to be treated in the same manner as a demurrer. 3 Such motion admits the allegations of fact in the petition but asserts that the facts alleged do not support issuance of the writ. 4
The petitioner and others had requested hearings before the state department after being denied certain additional benefits by the county agency administering the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schmidt v. Department of Local Affairs & DevelopmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Muskego-Norway Consolidated Schools Joint School District No. 9 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- State v. SeymourWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Allen v. State of West Virginia Human Rights CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
- County of Dane v. Department of Health & Social ServicesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Bahr v. GalonskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Laska v. SteinpreisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Dalton v. MundyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.