Legal Opinion

Will v. Department of Health & Social Services

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1969No. 141PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

To secure the writ of mandamus sought, appellant was required to establish “. . . a clear legal right” to the performance of a “. . . duty-sought to be enforced [which] is positive and plain . ...” 2 The motion to quash an alternative writ of mandamus is to be treated in the same manner as a demurrer. 3 Such motion admits the allegations of fact in the petition but asserts that the facts alleged do not support issuance of the writ. 4

The petitioner and others had requested hearings before the state department after being denied certain additional benefits by the county agency administering the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Schmidt v. Department of Local Affairs & DevelopmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Muskego-Norway Consolidated Schools Joint School District No. 9 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  5. State v. SeymourWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Allen v. State of West Virginia Human Rights CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. County of Dane v. Department of Health & Social ServicesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Bahr v. GalonskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Laska v. SteinpreisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State Ex Rel. Dalton v. MundyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API