State v. Seymour
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, C. J.
We will first consider the motion to dismiss because of mootness. Generally, if a question becomes moot through a change in circumstances, it will not be determined by the reviewing court. Lamoreux v. Williams (1905), 125 Wis. 543, 104 N. W. 813; State ex rel. Schertz v. Spiegel (1920), 171 Wis. 260, 176 N. W. 1022; 6 Wisconsin Law Review (1930), 101. It is a well-recognized exception that a reviewing court will retain jurisdiction and decide the issue if the question is one of great public importance. Carlyle v. Karns (1960), 9 Wis. (2d) 394, 101 N. W. (2d) 92; Wisconsin E. R. Board v.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wisconsin Employment Relations Board v. Allis-Chalmers Workers' Union, Local 248Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
- Doering v. SwobodaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Carlyle v. KarnsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Lamoreux v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- State ex rel. Schertz v. SpiegelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by25 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Strykowski v. WilkieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. SchumacherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
- State Ex Rel. La Crosse Tribune v. Circuit Court for La Crosse CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. LeitnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Milwaukee Professional Firefighters, Local 215 v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.