Legal Opinion

State v. Seymour

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1964PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, C. J.

We will first consider the motion to dismiss because of mootness. Generally, if a question becomes moot through a change in circumstances, it will not be determined by the reviewing court. Lamoreux v. Williams (1905), 125 Wis. 543, 104 N. W. 813; State ex rel. Schertz v. Spiegel (1920), 171 Wis. 260, 176 N. W. 1022; 6 Wisconsin Law Review (1930), 101. It is a well-recognized exception that a reviewing court will retain jurisdiction and decide the issue if the question is one of great public importance. Carlyle v. Karns (1960), 9 Wis. (2d) 394, 101 N. W. (2d) 92; Wisconsin E. R. Board v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board v. Allis-Chalmers Workers' Union, Local 248Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Doering v. SwobodaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Carlyle v. KarnsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Lamoreux v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  5. State ex rel. Schertz v. SpiegelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Strykowski v. WilkieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. SchumacherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State Ex Rel. La Crosse Tribune v. Circuit Court for La Crosse CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. LeitnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Milwaukee Professional Firefighters, Local 215 v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API