Legal Opinion

Allen v. State of West Virginia Human Rights Commission

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1984No. 16303PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGRAW, Justice:

The petitioners in this mandamus action, four individuals who have filed complaints with the West Virginia Human Rights Commission, and one individual who has attempted to file a complaint with the Commission, seek to compel the Commission, and its Executive Director, Howard D. Kenney, to: (1) accept complaints which meet criteria established in the statute and in rules and regulations promulgated by the agency; (2) employ at least one full-time hearing examiner to conduct public hearings; (3) promptly investigate all complaints filed; (4) conduct an immediate conciliation…

2Cases cited173 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

168 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Hutchison v. City of HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Kopp v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Frank's Shoe Store v. West Virginia Human Rights CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State Ex Rel. Frazier v. MeadowsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. McClung v. Marion County CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API