Legal Opinion

Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. City of Painesville

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1968No. 41074PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The primary question raised by this appeal is whether a municipality may refuse to consent to the installation of high voltage electric transmission lines which will pass through but not serve such municipality and whether it can regulate the construction or location of such lines if it does consent.

This court in State, ex rel. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co., v. Euclid, 169 Ohio St. 476, said in the syllabus:

“1. A municipal corporation may prescribe reasonable regulations for the installing of electric power lines through or into its territorial limits and may withhold its consent for…

2Cited by33 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Evans v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. City of Canton v. WhitmanOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. American Financial Services Ass'n v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Clermont Environmental Reclamation Co. v. WiederholdOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. City of Reading v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2006

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API