United States v. Barthelmess Ranch Corp.
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice McGRATH
¶1 This is an appeal by Barthelmess Ranch, Double 0 Ranch, William French, Conni French, Craig French and M Cross Cattle (the Objectors) from the Water Court’s August 11, 2015 Order Granting Partial Summary Judgment and Order Remanding to the Master. We affirm.
¶2 We restate the issues on appeal as follows:
Issue One: Whether the Water Court erred in concluding that the United States Bureau of Land Management (BLM) holds stockwatering rights under Montana law in reservoirs constructed on federal land for the use of permittees.
Issue Two: Whether the Water Court erred in concluding that the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Winters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Cappaert v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bailey v. TintingerMontana Supreme Court · 1912
- United States v. City & County of Denver Ex Rel. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- St. Onge v. BlakelyMontana Supreme Court · 1926
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Teton Coop Canal Co. v. Teton Coop Reservoir Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2018
- USA BLM - BarthelmessMontana Supreme Court · 2016
- United States v. KormanMontana Supreme Court · 2018
- Parrot Ditch v. AshcraftMontana Supreme Court · 2024
- Town of Kevin v. MT DNR&CMontana Supreme Court · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.