Legal Opinion

Ozark-Mahoning Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 8, 1958No. C. D. 2015PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JohnsoN, Judge:

The merchandise involved in this case consists of fluorspar shipped from Spain on the S. S. Gloria and entered at the port of Wilmington, Del., on April 26, 1954. It was assessed with duty at $8.40 per ton under paragraph 207 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as fluorspar, containing not more than 97 percent of calcium fluoride. It is claimed to consist of fluorspar, containing over 97 percent of calcium fluoride, dutiable at $2.10 per ton under said paragraph 207, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 52739.

The pertinent provisions…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Gage Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. Draper & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  3. Heyliger v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  4. United States v. LozanoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  5. Gonzalez v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Consolidated Cork Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. Gonzalez v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API