Gonzalez v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Johnson, Judge:
This is a protest against the collector’s assessment of duty on fluorspar, imported from Mexico on June 20, 1955, in *10car No. L & A 9156, at $8.40 per long ton, under paragraph. 207 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as fluorspar, containing not more than 97 per centum of calcium fluoride. It is claimed that the merchandise is fluorspar, containing more than 97 per centum of calcium fluoride, and is subject to duty at $2.10 per long ton under paragraph 207 of said tariff act, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 52739.
The only issue in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Gage Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Draper & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
- United States v. LozanoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Resolute Paper Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
3Cited by5 opinions
- Consolidated Cork Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Gonzalez v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- Ozark-Mahoning Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- Frank P. Dow Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Gonzalez v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964