Legal Opinion

Gonzalez v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 26, 1964No. C.D. 2487PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EichaedsoN, Judge:

This is a rehearing of a case decided by this court on December 24, 1957. T. H. Gonzalez v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 9, C.D. 1949.

The merchandise consists of fluorspar, which was assessed with duty at $8.40 per long ton under paragraph 207 of the Tariff Act of 1980 as fluorspar, containing not more than 97 percent of calcium fluoride. It is claimed that the merchandise contains more than 97 percent calcium fluoride and is dutiable at $2.10 per long ton under said paragraph 207, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 52739.

At…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Gage Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. Draper & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  3. United States v. LozanoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  4. Resolute Paper Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  5. Gonzalez v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Verrazzano Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  2. Consolidated Cork Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  3. Aluminum Co. of America v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  4. J. D. Smith Interocean, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
  5. Roser Customs Service v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API