Legal Opinion

State v. Sagdal

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 2015No. CC 100545212; CA A146601; SC S061846PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBalmer, C. J.

In this criminal case, we consider whether empan-elling a jury of fewer than 10 persons in a misdemeanor prosecution violates Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution. That provision states that, in the circuit court, 10 members of a jury may render a verdict of guilty or not guilty, while a later-enacted constitutional provision, Article VII (Amended), section 9, states that “[provision may be made by law for juries consisting of less than 12 but not less than six jurors.” Defendant was charged with reckless driving, a misdemeanor. The trial court refused defendant’s request for “a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Johnson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Burch v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Stranahan v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Ecumenical Ministries v. Oregon State Lottery CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. TurnidgeOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. LaneOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. LinkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  5. State v. RolfeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API