State v. Sagdal
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBalmer, C. J.
In this criminal case, we consider whether empan-elling a jury of fewer than 10 persons in a misdemeanor prosecution violates Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution. That provision states that, in the circuit court, 10 members of a jury may render a verdict of guilty or not guilty, while a later-enacted constitutional provision, Article VII (Amended), section 9, states that “[provision may be made by law for juries consisting of less than 12 but not less than six jurors.” Defendant was charged with reckless driving, a misdemeanor. The trial court refused defendant’s request for “a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Johnson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Burch v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Stranahan v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Ecumenical Ministries v. Oregon State Lottery CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. TurnidgeOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. LaneOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. LinkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. RolfeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.