Legal Opinion

Town of Washington v. Town of Warren

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 27, 1937PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.

The plaintiff town is seeking to recover the amount expended by it for the support of a pauper, Orlo Cooke, alleging that he belongs to the defendant town, and that the latter is obligated to support him under General Statutes, § 1693, which provides that “each town shall maintain and support all the poor inhabitants belonging to it, whether residing in it or in any other town in the state.” One “belongs” in a town in which he has acquired a legal settlement. Reading v. Westport, 19 Conn. 561, 564. The sole question here involved is whether Orlo’s legal settlement is in the town of Washington…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Inhabitants of Springfield v. Inhabitants of WilbrahamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  2. Town of Plainville v. Town of MilfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  3. Town of Roxbury v. Town of BridgewaterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  4. Town of Madison v. Town of GuilfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
  5. Town of Reading v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1849

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. DoeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
  2. Shea v. PetteeConnecticut Superior Court · 1954
  3. Town of Winchester v. Town of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  4. Town of Milford v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  5. Craig v. CraigConnecticut Superior Court · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API