Legal Opinion
Town of Winchester v. Town of Burlington
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 15, 1941PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover from the defendant expenses incurred for the support of Mrs. Georgiana Reynolds and her children, under the provisions of General Statutes, Cum. Sup. 1935, § 663c, quoted, so far as material in this case, to the footnote, 1 on the ground that their settlement was in the defendant town. The defendant conceded that until August 26, 1928, the Reynolds family did have a settlement in it, but it claimed that thereafter they acquired a settlement in the town of Colebrook; also that the facts did not bring the family within the class of persons for the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Town of Plainville v. Town of MilfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Town of Roxbury v. Town of BridgewaterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Town of Madison v. Town of GuilfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- Lathrop v. LathropSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Frank Rizzo, Inc. v. AlatsasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Trujillo v. Health & Social Services DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- Gierkont v. GierkontNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Martinez Ex Rel. Morales v. BynumSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Martinez Ex Rel. Morales v. BynumSupreme Court of the United States · 1983