Legal Opinion
Town of Plainville v. Town of Milford
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 21, 1935PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.
The plaintiff town seeks to recover $377.35 from the defendant for the care of Harry Rose-Turner from August 19th, 1932, to June 9th, 1934, upon the allegation that he had a settlement in Milford during that period, denying its own responsibility because of the provisions of General Statutes, § 1686: “No inhabitant of any town in this State shall gain a legal settlement in any other town, unless he shall have been admitted in the manner prescribed in section 1684; or unless he shall have resided, subject to the provisions of this chapter, four years continuously in such town, and shall have…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Inhabitants of Springfield v. Inhabitants of WilbrahamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
- Town of Roxbury v. Town of BridgewaterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Town of Sherburne v. Town of HartlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1865
- Thompson v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska · 1900
- Inhabitants of Lowell v. Inhabitants of NewportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1876
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- State v. DoeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Bates v. BatesNew York City Family Court · 1970
- Murphy v. MurphyNew York Supreme Court · 1954
- Town of Washington v. Town of WarrenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.