Legal Opinion

State v. Foster

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided August 26, 2011No. 104,083PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Standridge, J.:

Stephen Bernard Foster appeals his convictions and sentences for one count each of forgery, attempted theft, and possession of marijuana, arguing that diere was insufficient evidence to support the conviction of forgery and that the district court erred in failing to give the juiy an accomplice instruction. Foster also argues that the district court violated his Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights to the United States Constitution by enhancing his sentences based upon his prior criminal history without requiring his criminal history be proven to a jury beyond a reasonable…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. State v. IvorySupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  3. State v. TimleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  4. State v. ArnettSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  5. State v. ScaifeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  2. State v. FosterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  3. State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
  4. State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
  5. State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API