State v. Coleman
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Standridge, J.:
Rodney Coleman appeals from two separate forgeiy convictions, one for forgery as defined by K.S.A. 21-3710(a)(2) and the other for forgery as defined by K.S.A. 21-3710(a)(3). Relevant to both convictions, Coleman argues the State failed to present sufficient evidence to establish that he issued and delivered — or possessed and intended to issue and deliver — a fraudulent check, each of which are alternative means of committing forgeiy based on the juiy instructions at trial. Also relevant to both convictions, Coleman argues the State failed to present sufficient evidence to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. SchoonoverSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- State v. TimleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- State v. McCaslinSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- State v. ArnettSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012