Legal Opinion

State v. Foster

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 15, 2013No. 104,083PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnson, J.:

A jury convicted Stephen Bernard Foster of certain offenses that included the crime of forgery based upon his attempt to cash a $350 check at CheckSmart. The Court of Appeals affirmed the forgeiy conviction in a published opinion: State v. Foster, 46 Kan. App. 2d 233, 264 P.3d 116 (2011). In reaching its decision, the panel rejected Foster s argument that the terms “issuing or delivering” in K.S.A. 21-3710(a)(2) establish alternative means of committing forgery and that the State had failed to present sufficient evidence that Foster issued…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. KitchenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. TimleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  4. State v. WrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  5. State v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 2010

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McCoy v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
  2. State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  3. State v. BowenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  4. State v. BetancourtSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  5. State v. CastleberrySupreme Court of Kansas · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API