State v. Brown
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Luckert, J.:
In past decisions, this court has applied a super-sufficiency requirement for evidence in alternative means cases. When a single criminal offense may be committed by alternative means, jury unanimity is not required as to the means by which the crime was committed, as long as substantial evidence supports each alternative means set out in the juiy instructions. If the evidence is insufficient on one or more of the means on which the jury has been instructed, the conviction must be reversed.
Defendant George L. Brown II’s first issue on…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by116 opinions
- State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
- State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- State v. SotoSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- State v. BridgesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.