Legal Opinion

Bassis v. Rutenberg

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 14, 1955No. Appeal, 304PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from the entry of judgment for the defendant on the pleadings.

The action is in assumpsit based upon allegations in the complaint to this effect: Plaintiff is a certified public accountant licensed to practice in the State of New York. He had acted for Morris Rabinowitz in the preparation of his Federal income tax returns for a number of years. In January 1947 Rabinowitz notified plaintiff that his income tax returns for the years 1944 and 1945 were about to be investigated. If there were inaccuracies in these returns plaintiff was not to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Luzerne Township v. Fayette CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. John Conti Co., Inc. v. DonovanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Nickoll v. Racine Cloak & Suit Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Bronzin Holding Co. v. McGeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. Diggs v. Taylor and Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Martin v. PooleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Zawada v. Pennsylvania System Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Terry v. PipkinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Porter v. NossenDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Pulli v. Warren National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API