Diggs v. Taylor and Company, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Maxey,
Appellant, a tax accountant, in 1925 made an oral agreement with Taylor and Company, appellee, whereby he should receive as a fee 25 per cent of all “refunds” of appellee’s income taxes for prior years procured, through his services, from the United States Government. Appellant also used the expression “25 per cent of what we saved them,” which we deem synonymous with “refunds” as used in this connection. Certain payments were refunded to appellee by the government and appellant received one-quarter of these as his fee. Additional claims for refunds were refused…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wooldridge v. BradburyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Underwood v. RichCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
3Cited by9 opinions
- Almi, Inc. v. Dick Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Citizens Bank v. C & H Construction & Paving Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- Miernicki v. SeltzerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Topton National Bank v. HollandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Esakovich, Exrs. v. GroudineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.