Legal Opinion

Bronzin Holding Co. v. McGee

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 5, 1926No. 25,128PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

On December 1, 1924, the plaintiff leased to the defendant for a year an apartment in its apartment building. On May 15, 1925, the defendant ceased occupancy. The action is for the rent for June which became due June 1, 1925. The defense claimed is a constructive eviction. The amended answer • of the defendant was stricken as sham and frivolous. Judgment was entered for the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals from the order striking out and the judgment.

An answer, though on its face good, is sham when it is so clearly false that it tenders no genuine issue for trial. Sheets v. Ramer, 125…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sheets v. RamerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Bank of Richards v. SheasgreenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  3. Segerstrom v. Holland Piano Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. O'Donnell v. LesselyoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  5. Greenstein v. ConradiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gassler v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. Western Gravel Co. v. M. J. Nolan Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. Bassis v. RutenbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  5. Knudson v. PedersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API