Legal Opinion

C.H. Robinson International v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 31, 2005No. 04-1021 CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAMICH, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of-the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under RCFC 12(b)(6). For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES the motion.

I. Introduction

C.H. Robinson International (“C.H. Robinson” or “Plaintiff’) brought this action on June 17, 2004, seeking refund of $57,212 which it paid to the government as mitigated liquidated damages for allegedly violating Customs regulation 19 C.F.R. §…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. Miree v. DeKalb CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. McLain v. Real Estate Board of New Orleans, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Peterson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  2. Cricket Hosiery, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  3. United States v. C.H. Robinson Co.United States Court of International Trade · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API