Legal Opinion

United States v. C.H. Robinson Co.

United States Court of International Trade

Decided November 7, 2012No. Slip Op. 12-134; Court 06-00434PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

GORDON, Judge:

This opinion follows a bench trial. Plaintiff United States (the “Government”) brought this action pursuant to Section 553 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1553 (2006) 1 ; and 19 C.F.R. § 18.8(c), to recover certain duties, taxes, and fees from Defendant C.H. Robinson Company (“C.H. Robinson”). The court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1582(3) (2006). For the reasons set forth below, the court adjudges C.H. Robinson liable for the duties, taxes, and fees demanded by the United States.

I. Background

This action involves the Government’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Technology Licensing Corp. v. Videotek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. Imperial Food Imports, and American Motorists Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. GoodmanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  5. Elmar Bosies and Rudi Gall v. James J. Benedict and Christopher M. PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Great American InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. American Home Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. American Home Assurance Co.United States Court of International Trade · 2014
  4. United States v. C.H. Robinson CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API