Legal Opinion
Milton Roy Co. v. Bausch & Lomb Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 9, 1976No. Civ. A. 75-368PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CALEB M. WRIGHT, Senior District Judge.
This case concerns the validity and enforceability of certain patents relating to the manufacture of so-called “soft contact lenses” (“soft lenses”). 1 The patents at issue are owned by the Defendant Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, which has exclusively sublicensed them to the Defendant National Patent Development Corp., which in turn sublicensed them to its subsidiaries, Flexible Contact Lens Corp. and Flexible Contact Lens (Nevada), Inc. 2 The National defendants in turn granted an exclusive sublicense to Defendant Bausch & Lomb, Inc. (“B &…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Teddy Ray DyerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Warner-Jenkinson Company, and H. Kohnstamm & Company, Inc., Plaintiffs v. Allied Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. Nabisco Brands, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1988
- Southmark Prime Plus, L.P. v. FalzoneDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1991
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. DyerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.