Legal Opinion
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Studiengesellschaft Kohle mbH
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided April 24, 1975No. Civ. A. 74-87PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CALEB M. WRIGHT, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Eastman Kodak Company (Kodak) has brought this action for a declaratory judgment that United States Patents Nos. 3,113,115, 3,231,515, 3,257,332, 3,392,162, and 3,826,792, all owned by defendant Studiengesellschaft Kohl mbH (SGK), are invalid, unenforceable, and not infringed. Kodak is a New Jersey corporation with its principal place of business in Rochester, New York. Defendant is a West German organization equivalent to a corporation with its principal place of business at Mulheim, a. d. Ruhr, West Germany. This action…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Eccles v. Peoples Bank of Lakewood VillageSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Japan Gas Lighter Association v. Ronson Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1966
- Karl Ziegler, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Phillips Petroleum Company, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Nova Biomedical Corporation v. Willi Moller, D/b/a/ Gebruder Moller GlasblasereiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Fehl v. S. W. C. Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
- Superior Coal Co. v. Ruhrkohle A.G.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Milton Roy Co. v. Bausch & Lomb Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1976
- Bounty-Full Entertainment, Inc. v. Forever Blue Entertainment Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.