Legal Opinion

Waltham Watch Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 7, 1938No. 4107Published

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

Certain unfinished watch pillar or bottom plates were imported by the Jaeger Watch Co., Inc. (in this appeal styled “party in interest”) at the port of New York in 1935, and were classified by the Collector of Customs under paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as “articles composed in chief value of copper and assessed with duty at 45 per centum ad valorem thereunder plus 3 •cents per pound on the weight thereof under section 601 of the Revenue Act of 1932.

The Waltham Watch Co., appellant herein, an American manufacturer of watches, protested the said classification and assessment of duty…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Worthington v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Magone v. WiedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. United States v. LyonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  4. Athenia Steel & Wire Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. United States v. RigaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API