Legal Opinion

Velardi v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 17, 1979PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLongo, J.

Section 31-284 of the General Statutes, in part, provides, as a basic tenet of our workmen’s compensation law, that “[a]n employer shall not be liable to any action for damages on account of personal injury sustained by an employee arising out of and in the course of his employment.” Section 31-293a provides, in part, that “no action may be brought against . . . [a] fellow employee except for negligence in the operation of a motor vehicle.” In this case, we are called upon to decide whether the trial court erred when, in construing these statutes, it determined that the defendant Frank Valla,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Spencer v. Good Earth Restaurant CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Kasowitz v. Mutual Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  3. McDonald v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  4. Cappiello v. HaselmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  5. Farrell v. L. G. DeFelice & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Bartha v. Waterbury House Wrecking Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Kakadelis v. DeFabritisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. Keogh v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. Bouley v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. McKinley v. MusshornSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API